Primary care intervention to reduce alcohol misuse ranking its health impact and cost effectiveness

Author/s: 
Solberg, Leif I., Maciosek, Michael V., Edwards, Nichol M.
Date Added: 
January 2, 2019
Journal/Publication: 
American Journal of Preventative Medicine
Publisher: 
American College of Preventative Medicine and Association for Prevention Teaching and Research
Publication Date: 
February 1, 2008
Issue: 
2
Volume: 
34
Pages: 
143-152
Type: 
Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines
Format: 
Article
DOI (1): 
10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.035
PMID (1): 
18201645
Keywords 

RPR Commentary

This systematic review concluded that screening, brief interventions, and treatment of alcohol use disorders was one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse. This study was designed to develop a standardized rating for the clinically preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services.

METHODS:

A systematic review of the literature from 1992 through 2004 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials and cost-effectiveness studies was completed in 2005. Clinically preventable burden (CPB) was calculated as the product of effectiveness times the alcohol-attributable fraction of both mortality and morbidity (measured in quality-adjusted life years or QALYs), for all relevant conditions. Cost effectiveness from both the societal perspective and the health-system perspective was estimated. These analyses were completed in 2006.

RESULTS:

The calculated CPB was 176,000 QALYs saved over the lifetime of a birth cohort of 4,000,000, with a range in sensitivity analysis from -43% to +94% (primarily due to variation in estimates of effectiveness). Screening and brief counseling was cost-saving from the societal perspective and had a cost-effectiveness ratio of $1755/QALY saved from the health-system perspective. Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using standardized methods. Since current levels of delivery are the lowest of comparably ranked services, this service deserves special attention by clinicians and care delivery systems.

Text Availability

Commercial full text (fees may apply)