1. Home
  2. Radiology

Radiology

Approach to pelvic venous disorders

Author/s: 
Andrew D Brown

Objective: To provide a practical guide to help family physicians recognize, diagnose, and manage patients with pelvic venous disorders (PeVDs), often overlooked as causes of chronic pelvic pain and varicose veins.

Sources of information: This review is based on guidelines from the American Venous Forum, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, the Society of Interventional Radiology, and the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

Main message: PeVDs are common, though frequently misdiagnosed, causes of chronic pelvic pain and varicose veins predominantly in female patients. These conditions arise from venous reflux or obstruction, which can cause varicose veins and venous hypertension in the renal hilum, pelvis, perineum, and lower extremities. Family physicians should recognize the clinical signs of PeVDs and use appropriate imaging to confirm diagnoses. Interventional treatments, including embolization and stenting, are effective for symptom management and improving patient outcomes.

Conclusion: Early recognition of patients with PeVDs by family physicians is crucial for timely and effective treatment. By using appropriate diagnostic tools and making timely referrals, physicians can substantially improve patients' quality of life.

Keywords 
Perineum female quality of life physicians family Radiology Interventional Varicose Veins Vascular Surgical Procedures hypertension

Discussions of Dense Breasts, Breast Cancer Risk, and Screening Choices in 2019

Author/s: 
Kerlikowske, Karla", C.M., Miglioretti, D.L.

Breast density, a radiologic term that describes the proportion of parenchymal relative to fatty tissue in mammograms, is a strong and prevalent risk factor. With increasing breast density, the risk of having a breast cancer masked or hidden on mammography increases, as does future breast cancer risk.1 Almost 50% of US women aged 40 to 74 years have dense breasts (an estimated 27.6 million women). The widespread incorporation of breast density information into screening mammography reports in 36 US states and suggestion to consider supplemental imaging has resulted in women raising questions about breast density and supplemental imaging with their clinicians.2 Thus, clinicians need to be knowledgeable of the clinical significance of breast density and how it may be useful when combined with breast cancer risk to inform screening discussions.

Keywords 
breast cancer Breast Radiologists Radiology mammography screening mammography
Subscribe to Radiology